Curious how your mind handles deceptively simple problems? The 3 question IQ test, also known as the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), will show you. Developed to measure your ability to override intuition with analytical thinking, this brief yet challenging test might surprise you. Find out what the test involves and see if you can beat the odds.

## Key Takeaways

- The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) was created to assess how well people can think analytically rather than relying on their gut instincts.
- The CRT consists of three tricky questions that highlight common cognitive biases, revealing that many struggle with reflective thinking.
- Scoring well on the CRT indicates strong analytical skills and better decision-making abilities, making it useful in various fields like finance and business strategy.

## What is the Cognitive Reflection Test?

In 2005, psychologist Shane Frederick developed the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT). This test was designed to assess an individual’s ability to reflect on their intuitive responses. It aims to gauge how well individuals can override intuitive responses with reflective thinking. In other words, it’s designed to see how well you can suppress your gut reaction in favor of more analytical thinking.

In educational settings, the CRT is often used to gauge students’ analytical thinking skills and their propensity for reflective reasoning. Interestingly, despite its straightforward nature, only 20 to 40 percent of students pass the CRT, highlighting its ability to distinguish between intuitive and reflective thinkers.

Grasping the CRT’s purpose and structure reveals how our minds tackle simple yet deceptive problems. Here are the three questions that form the world’s shortest IQ test.

## The Three Questions of the World's Shortest IQ Test

The CRT is composed of three answers that test reflective thinking by requiring deep analysis rather than immediate intuitive responses.

Each CRT question evaluates a person’s cognitive ability, showing how well individuals reflect and reason through challenging scenarios. Here is a look at each question.

## Bat and Ball Problem

The first question is the Bat and Ball Problem: a bat and a ball together cost $1.10, with the bat costing $1 more than the ball cost. Many jump to the conclusion that the ball costs 10 cents, which is incorrect.

The problem tricks us into simplifying the math. If the ball were 10 cents, the bat would be $1.10, totaling $1.20. Solving it correctly requires more analytical thought.

Setting up the equation, if the ball costs X dollars, the bat costs X + 1 dollars. Together, that’s $1.10, so 2X + 1 = 1.10. Solving for X, the ball costs 5 cents and the bat $1.05, totaling $1.10.

## Widget-Making Machine Problem

The second question, the Widget-Making Machine Problem, asks how long 100 machines would take to produce 100 widgets if 5 machines take 5 minutes to make 5 widgets. This challenges analytical thinking as intuition can be misleading.

Many mistakenly think the wrong answer is 100 minutes, assuming time scales with the number of machines and widgets. However, this misinterprets the problem’s structure.

The correct answer is 5 minutes. If 5 machines make 5 widgets in 5 minutes, then 1 machine makes 1 widget in 5 minutes. Hence, 100 machines make 100 widgets in 5 minutes.

## Lily Pad Patch Problem

The third question is the lily pads patch Problem: a lily pad patch doubles in size each day. If it covers the entire lake in 48 days, it covers half the lake in 47 days, illustrating exponential growth. The patch of lily pads doubles in size each day.

Many initially think the answer is 24 days, but this overlooks the doubling nature of growth. If the patch doubles every day, it must be half the size of its final size on day 47.

Covering the entire lake in 48 days means it takes 47 days to cover half and cover the entire lake. This exponential growth concept defies linear intuition but makes sense once understood.

## Common Incorrect Answers

Many fall into the trap of intuitive but incorrect answers on the CRT. For instance, a common mistake in the Bat and Ball Problem is thinking the ball costs 10 cents, highlighting a cognitive error in reasoning.

A frequent incorrect response to the Widget-Making Machine Problem is 100 minutes, due to the mistaken belief that more machines mean more time. Correct analysis shows the time remains constant.

Similarly, many assume it takes 24 days to cover half the lake in the Lily Pad Patch Problem, failing to recognize exponential growth. Understanding these mistakes highlights the value of reflective thinking over gut responses.

## Correct Answers Explained

The correct answers to the CRT questions reveal our cognitive processes. In the Bat and Ball Problem, the ball costs 5 cents. Recognizing that the bat costs X + 1 dollar and solving 2X + 1 = 1.10 leads to this conclusion, which must be answered correctly.

For the Widget-Making Machine Problem, understanding that 5 machines make 5 widgets in 5 minutes means 100 machines also take 5 minutes for 100 widgets, highlighting the importance of recognizing constant rates.

The correct answer to the Lily Pad Patch Problem is 47 days for half the lake, derived from understanding that daily doubling means it must be half its size the day before covering the entire lake with a patch to cover half.

## Why Most People Fail the CRT

The CRT evaluates the ability to suppress instinctive responses in favor of thoughtful analysis. Research shows that highly educated individuals often struggle with the CRT due to over-reliance on intuition, overlooking deeper analytical solutions.

A significant number of individuals, including 83% of survey participants, failed to answer at least one CRT question correctly. This stems from a tendency to rely on quick, surface-level reasoning rather than deeper analysis, illustrating a common cognitive bias.

The CRT’s relevance goes beyond problem-solving, demonstrating predictive power in strategic behavior and avoiding cognitive biases, making it useful in fields like behavioral finance and decision-making under uncertainty.

## The Significance of Scoring Well

Scoring well on the CRT indicates the ability to challenge intuitive responses and engage in deeper reflection, crucial for rational decision-making and avoiding cognitive traps. High scores reflect strong analytical thinking.

Research shows only about 17% of participants answer all three CRT questions correctly, demonstrating exceptional problem-solving skills and critical thinking.

Scoring well on the CRT reflects strong cognitive abilities and critical thinking, highlighting the importance of reflective thought in both academic and real-world scenarios.

## Practical Applications of the CRT

The CRT’s value extends beyond academics. High scores correlate with better decision-making abilities and a greater tendency to use analytical thought, indicating strong problem-solving skills in complex situations.

High CRT scores correlate with general cognitive abilities, suggesting proficiency in various cognitive tasks. This makes the CRT useful in fields like business strategy, where critical thinking and decision-making are key.

Additionally, CRT insights aid in behavioral finance, helping individuals and organizations make more rational, less biased decisions. Its wide applications make it valuable for personal and professional development.

## Summary

The Cognitive Reflection Test is a fascinating tool that challenges our intuitive responses and promotes deeper analytical thinking. Its three simple yet deceptive questions reveal much about our cognitive processes and the importance of reflective thought.

Scoring well on the CRT not only indicates strong problem-solving skills but also highlights an individual’s ability to think critically and make rational decisions. Embracing the CRT’s principles can lead to better decision-making and a deeper understanding of our cognitive abilities.

**Read more**